Sheriff Chris Nanos Urged to Resign After Deputies’ Union Votes ‘No Confidence’





Sheriff Chris Nanos Faces Resignation Calls After No Confidence Vote

Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos Faces Calls for Resignation After Unanimous ‘No Confidence’ Vote

TUCSON, AZ — Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos is facing an unprecedented internal rebellion as the Pima County Deputy Sheriffs’ Association (PCDSA) issued a unanimous “no confidence” vote against his leadership this week. The stinging rebuke from his own subordinates includes an official demand for his immediate resignation, citing a breakdown in department morale and leadership failures during a time of intense public scrutiny.

A Department in Turmoil

The vote, which represents a significant majority of the rank-and-file deputies within the department, marks a dramatic escalation in the ongoing friction between Nanos and his staff. Union leaders described the unanimous decision as a necessary step to address what they characterize as a “toxic” work environment and a lack of transparency from the Sheriff’s executive suite.

According to representatives from the PCDSA, the vote was not triggered by a single event but is rather the culmination of long-standing grievances regarding resource allocation, staffing shortages, and the overall strategic direction of the Pima County Sheriff’s Department (PCSD).

The Search for Nancy Guthrie

The internal crisis comes at a particularly sensitive time for Sheriff Nanos, who is currently overseeing the high-profile investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. Nancy, the mother of Today Show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, went missing in the Pima County area earlier this year, sparking a massive multi-agency search effort.

Despite the high stakes and national media attention, the search efforts have been described as “fruitless” thus far. Critics within the department have suggested that the lack of progress in the Guthrie case is symptomatic of broader organizational issues that the union believes have hampered the department’s effectiveness under Nanos’s tenure.

Mounting Pressure and Political Fallout

While a “no confidence” vote is a symbolic gesture and does not legally compel a sheriff to vacate their office, it carries immense political weight. For an elected official like Nanos, losing the support of the deputies who carry out the department’s daily operations can be a fatal blow to a re-election campaign or general public trust.

“Our members have spoken with one voice: they no longer believe Sheriff Nanos is capable of leading this department with the integrity and vision Pima County deserves,” the union said in a statement released shortly after the vote. “For the sake of the department and the community we serve, we believe it is time for a change in leadership.”

The Sheriff’s Response

As of Thursday morning, Sheriff Nanos has not officially responded to the calls for his resignation. In the past, Nanos has defended his record, pointing to his decades of experience in law enforcement and the complexities of managing one of the largest sheriff’s departments in the Southwest.

As the search for Nancy Guthrie continues, the eyes of the nation—and now the focused scrutiny of his own deputies—remain fixed on Nanos. Whether the Sheriff can weather this internal storm or if the “no confidence” vote will lead to a transition in leadership remains the central question facing Pima County law enforcement.


This is a developing story. Updates will be provided as more information becomes available.


Leave a Comment